SAPS capture: The psychological tactics behind the criminal grooming of police officials

Gcwalisile Khanyile

A slow erosion of boundaries through access, flattery, problem-solving help, emotional availability, gifts, or “small” favors, which then escalate to requests that create obligation, are some of the tactics used by criminals to groom senior officials, and these could be curbed through regular psychometric testing, experts say.

This is after the Madlanga Commission proceedings brought to light personal relationships, such as the ‘boyfriend and crime boss’ link, and the ‘brother’ relationship between senior police officials and alleged criminal bosses, revealing a glimpse of how these serve as the ‘soft tissue’ connecting organized crime to the police.

Among the relationships that came under the spotlight is that of the suspended Ekurhuleni Metro Police Department deputy chief,Commissioner Julius Mkhwanazi, who admitted that he regarded underworld figure Vusimuzi ‘Cat’ Matlala as a ‘brother’, and the KwaZulu-Natal head of Hawks, Major General Lesetja Senona, who also referred to Matlala as a ‘brother’, which he said was out of respect.

Brigadier Rachel Matjeng, section head for Quality Management for Criminal Records and Crime Scene Management at the Forensic Services Division in Pretoria, admitted to an on-and-off romantic relationship with the alleged crime syndicate boss, Matlala.

Under questioning, Mkhwanazi confirmed that Matlala was not just a business associate but someone he regarded as a ‘brother’. The allegations against Mkhwanazi state that he facilitated the installation of blue emergency lights, intended for law enforcement, on vehicles linked to Matlala’s security company, CAT VIP. There were also financial benefits provided by Matlala to Mkhwanazi.

It was revealed at the commission that Senona allegedly sent a SAPS docket to Matlala, which contained the names, ID numbers, and identity photos of several SAPS and Hawks members. It also included cellphone numbers of the officers and the specific police stations where they were based. Some of the exposed identities belonged to members of Crime Intelligence, whose identities are typically protected for operational safety.

Senona also admitted to forwarding a letter from the National Police Commissioner, General Fannie Masemola, to Matlala, which officially terminated Matlala’s R360 million Medicare24 contract with the police. While this was an official administrative action, Senona is alleged to have encouraged Matlala to legally take the SAPS on regarding the cancellation.

Matjengacknowledged receiving money, including an alleged R300,000, and luxury gifts like flowers and chocolates. She insisted these were personal “gifts from a boyfriend” and not bribes related to his business interests. She admitted that some money was deposited into a friend’s bank account to hide the transactions from Matlala’s wife.

Matjeng stated that she was not part of the adjudication panel and had no authority over the approval of the R360 million Medicare24 contract with the police. She claimed she actually used her relationship to protect the SAPS.

The commission’s interim report, adopted by President Cyril Ramaphosa, has already recommended further criminal investigation into Senona, Mkhwanazi, Matjeng, and other senior officials for their links to Matlala.

Dr. Mary Mangai, a senior lecturer at the School of Public Management and Administration at the University of Pretoria, said that a high-ranking official does not usually ‘switch off’ reality overnight.

Mangai said that in many cases, what happens is psychological compartmentalization, where the person mentally separates “my private relationship” from “my professional duty,” and then uses rationalizations to protect a positive self-image.

Identity fusion with a social circle, she said, occurs when repeated contact, shared language such as “brother,” private loyalty, and mutual dependency begin to replace institutional identity. At that point, scrutiny of the associate is experienced as an attack on the self.

“Organised crime literature has long described how corruption networks thrive through relational influence and favor-trading, not only through overt bribery. In plain terms, once a person’s emotional identity migrates from institution to informal network, objectivity becomes very difficult,” Mangai said.

Describing how criminal cartels groom senior officials, she said, it is usually a slow erosion of boundaries, not an immediate ‘aggressive takeover.’ It often starts with access, flattery, problem-solving help, emotional availability, gifts, or ‘small’ favors, then escalates to requests that create obligation.

“Public-integrity guidance repeatedly warns that private benefits and relational closeness can create conflicts of interest long before a clearly criminal exchange is visible. The danger is cumulative: by the time the high-risk request comes, the relationship has already normalised dependency,” Mangai stated.

Once an official has accepted emotional support or a ‘brotherly’ favor, saying ‘no’ later becomes psychologically harder because of the reciprocity pressure of ‘I owe him’, consistency pressure, such as ‘I can’t now act like we’re not close’, and reputational fear like ‘if I refuse, what will he expose?’.

“That does not remove legal or ethical agency, but it does increase friction against refusal. This is exactly why integrity systems require early disclosure, recusal, and intervention before the relationship reaches a coercive stage,” Mangai explained.

She stated that behavioral ethics research shows people often miss or excuse misconduct when it develops gradually, and social-psychology work explains how influence processes can make this feel normal rather than shocking in the moment.

“So, it is often less a total break from reality than a staged distortion of reality,” Mangai said.

Professor Nirmala Gopal, a senior criminology lecturer at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, said that the relationship between a senior officer and a criminal is less about trust or care and more about mutual financial benefit.

“The use of kinship language seems to function as a veneer, masking motivations that are fundamentally transactional. What is most troubling, however, is not the existence of the arrangement itself but the role played by the police officer. By engaging in this dynamic, they seem to be aware of the psychological games at play. The officer demonstrates a troubling lapse in moral judgment. Law enforcement officers are entrusted with public confidence and ethical responsibility; when personal gain takes precedence over integrity, that trust is inevitably undermined,” Gopal stated.

In these kinds of relationships, power isn’t fixed. It can reside with either party and shift depending on what is at stake. Typically, the crime boss is looking for inside information that offers an advantage. In some cases, that expectation extends to favors, such as cases quietly disappearing, depending on the officer’s influence, she said.

Gopal added that the recruitment of senior officers by criminal syndicates rarely starts with power alone; more often, it begins with vulnerability, financial pressure, or personal difficulties that make an officer easier to approach, easier to persuade, and harder to walk away once the line has been crossed.

She stated that if a ‘captured brother’ is at the top, damage can spread quickly because subordinates take cues from leadership.

How quickly that influence corrodes the ranks often depends on how the leader is viewed: as untouchable, admired, feared, or simply impossible to challenge. In such environments, ethical lines can blur with alarming ease, Gopal said.

She advised that one practical step the police could take is to make regular psychometric testing part of the job.

“Policing is challenging work. Officers deal with constant pressure, high stress, and difficult moral choices every day. Ongoing assessments could help track not only cognitive ability but also emotional intelligence and personality traits over time. This wouldn’t be about punishment. It would be about understanding,” Gopal said.

She stated that regular check-ins could highlight strengths, show where extra support or training is needed, and catch early warning signs when behavior or mental well-being begins to shift. That means help can come before problems spiral out of control.

[email protected]

Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Others

Subscribe Newsletters

Feel free to subscribe here to get more newsletter updates

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

The nest of the latest updated information

Info

News

Subscribes

About Us

Useful Links

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

8657 Elmwood Avenue Logansport, IN 46947